GIGABYTE GB-BKi7HA-7500 Kaby Lake BRIX Reviewby Ganesh T S on March 16, 2017 8:00 AM EST
The GIGABYTE GB-BKi7HA-7500 is an actively cooled PC. The fan curves in the BIOS are also quite aggressive, making it a bit more noisy compared to other Kaby Lake-U PCs that we have evaluated before. As such, it is not a perfect HTPC. However, it does support 4K Netflix (like the ASRock Beebox-S 7200U). Some readers had also requested madVR performance testing with the Intel HD Graphics 620. Given these aspects, we thought it would be worthwhile to look at the HTPC aspects of the PC.
Refresh Rate Accuracy
Starting with Haswell, Intel, AMD and NVIDIA have been on par with respect to display refresh rate accuracy. The most important refresh rate for videophiles is obviously 23.976 Hz (the 23 Hz setting). As expected, the GIGABYTE GB-BKi7HA-7500 has no trouble with refreshing the display appropriately in this setting.
The gallery below presents some of the other refresh rates that we tested out. The first statistic in madVR's OSD indicates the display refresh rate.
Network Streaming Efficiency
Evaluation of OTT playback efficiency was done by playing back our standard YouTube test stream and five minutes from our standard Netflix test title. Using HTML5, the YouTube stream plays back a 1080p encoding. Since YouTube now defaults to HTML5 for video playback, we have stopped evaluating Adobe Flash acceleration. Note that only NVIDIA exposes GPU and VPU loads separately. Both Intel and AMD bundle the decoder load along with the GPU load. The following two graphs show the power consumption at the wall for playback of the HTML5 stream in Mozilla Firefox (v 51.0.1). The graphs below show that our BRIX configuration is not a particularly power-efficient one for OTT streaming. It is obviously possible to lower these numbers by using a SATA SSD and a single SODIMM without any performance or feature set loss for OTT streaming workloads.
GPU load was around 14.1% for the YouTube HTML5 stream and 0.01166% for the steady state 6 Mbps Netflix streaming case.
Netflix streaming evaluation was done using the Windows 10 Netflix app. Manual stream selection is available (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-S) and debug information / statistics can also be viewed (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-D). Statistics collected for the YouTube streaming experiment were also collected here.
Decoding and Rendering Benchmarks
We have already seen in our previous KBL-U UCFF PC reviews that the Intel HD Graphics 620 has absolutely no trouble with video playback using either Kodi or MPC-HC's default EVR-CP renderer. In order to present a different perspective, we decided to evaluate a madVR configuration as well as the latest Kodi release (Kodi 17.1 RC) on the GB-BKi7HA-7500.
Under madVR (0.91.7), we used the DXVA2 scaling logic wherever applicable (as it is known to be the best choice for Intel IGPs). For scaling situations where the dedicated scaler inside the GPU couldn't be used, we chose Jinc. The rest of the madVR settings were left at default. MPC-HC 1.7.11 was used for playback, and LAV Filters 0.69 was configured in the native DXVA2 mode for the decoder.
In our earlier reviews, we focused on presenting the GPU loading and power consumption at the wall in a table (with problematic streams in bold). Starting with the Broadwell NUC review, we decided to represent the GPU load and power consumption in a graph with dual Y-axes. Elevent different test streams of 90 seconds each were played back with a gap of 30 seconds between each of them. The characteristics of each stream are annotated at the bottom of the graph. Note that the GPU usage is graphed in red and needs to be considered against the left axis, while the at-wall power consumption is graphed in blue and needs to be considered against the right axis. The GPU power consumption as reported by the processor is also recorded in green.
Frame drops are evident whenever the GPU load consistently stays above the 85 - 90% mark. We find that the GB-BKi7HA-7500 can't handle scenarios where upscaling is required (we use a 1080p display for this evaluation). However, 1080i/p and 4K content were decoded and rendered without any issues.
We also performed a similar evaluation with Kodi 17.1RC in its default configuration. Kodi has absolutely no issues in playing back our test streams.
Kaby Lake-U has one of the most comprehensive codec supports in the market after Intel decided to add HEVC 8b and 10b full hardware decode. In fact, there is also support for 10-bit VP9 in the GPU. It is a pity that the display engine still doesn't support HDMI 2.0 natively. However, GIGABYTE has integrated a LSPCon and ensured that the lack of native support is not a problem for the GB-BKi7HA-7500.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
peterfares - Thursday, March 16, 2017 - linkThe Mac Mini is quite a bit larger than these things, that's how the power supply is integrated. That said, I do prefer the Mac Mini's form-factor more. I would take a larger box and have the power supply integrated, I've always hated external power supplies. Especially in monitors - I now only buy monitors with built in power supplies.
TheinsanegamerN - Monday, March 20, 2017 - linkOTOH, external is a heck of a lot easier to replace when it goes bad. And easier to get replacements, as third parties will make externals, but not proprietary internals.
capedave - Friday, March 17, 2017 - linkPower brick never bothers me, as long as it is QUALITY. Better slower quieter more powerful fans? Hell yes!
geok1ng - Friday, March 17, 2017 - linki have a hard time trying to understand the market niche for such products. they cost between a chinese 2in1 and an ultrabook, without offering many advantages over either. a SFF PC with a pentium G4560 would cost a fraction of it, while having a slightly bigger footprint. The way i see it, one either picks a performance king, like the 7267U, a budget king like the G4560, or a power sipper like the 7Y57. I fail to understand why choose a 15w SKU that does not perform when you have 3 alternatives that either cost much less, draw much less power or deliver much better graphics performance.
kaidenshi - Sunday, March 19, 2017 - link"a SFF PC with a pentium G4560 would cost a fraction of it, while having a slightly bigger footprint."
Indeed, my main workstation is a Skylake G4500 and it's more than fast enough. It's in a mid tower case but I could switch to a mini-ITX board and case, keeping the rest of my components, and have something 1/4 the size with the same power. Having it in a Brix/NUC format would be even better since I don't play AAA games and have no need for a discrete GPU.
I guess we don't see Pentium Gxxxx in SFF PCs because there's really no profit margin for those CPUs.
capedave - Friday, March 17, 2017 - linkA shame that more noise analysis is not mandatory in computer reviews. From what tiny amount of information exists, I am thinking it is too loud for me. Decibels? Who knows?
awehring - Friday, March 17, 2017 - link+1
Sailor23M - Sunday, March 19, 2017 - linkWas really looking for the comparison against the Intel Skull Canyon NUC
1_rick - Saturday, April 15, 2017 - linkI suspect it doesn't compare to the Skull Canyon. No Iris and only has half the cores.
DroidTomTom - Saturday, April 1, 2017 - linkThe NUC market is one area where more competition is needed. Same price as a similarly equipped laptop minus monitor, speakers, web cam, keyboard, and mouse. I really hope Ryzen can make a huge dent in this area.