As I opened my inbox this morning, I was surprised. I keep track of when Intel puts products on End of Life (or starts the process through something called Product Discontinuance), and so I usually see a run of 3-5 year old CPUs or storage or servers pass through without much of a worry. When I opened up my daily brief today however, the headline read ‘Core Processor with Hybrid Technology Discontinued’, which immediately struck me as a bit crazy.

Intel announced Lakefield, its only Hybrid CPU on the market, in January 2019. It pairs one of its big cores with four smaller Atom cores in a small 12mm square package. Not only this, Lakefield is one of Intel’s first Foveros packaging processors, with a 10nm compute piece of silicon sitting on top of an IO die, all packaged together with DRAM on top. The goal of the Lakefield design was to produce a processor with a super low idle power, but also have enough performance for hand-held devices. Intel quoted 1.2 mW when in idle, meeting that goal.

Lakefield came to market in June 2020 in two products: the Samsung Galaxy Book S 13.3-inch clamshell laptop, and the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Fold, a foldable display-based design. Both of these products were premium priced, particularly the Fold with its display, however reported performance was more akin to a quad-core Atom notebook than the $2000 quad-core mobile devices they were aiming for. Battery life sounded good, although we have never tested it at AnandTech due to lack of access to review samples from Samsung, Lenovo, or Intel.

The key thing was the Hybrid CPU design. By pairing one of Intel’s big cores with four of its smaller Tremont Atom cores, the goal was to run the device almost exclusively on the Atom cores for efficiency and then call on the big core when anything latency related was required, such as when the user touches the screen or the keyboard. Within 16 milliseconds (or one frame at 60 Hz), the processor would switch over to the big core for the touch screen interaction, do what it needed to do (often in under 16 ms), and then power back down.

In principle, the concept is sound and makes a lot of sense, especially if the goal is to save battery. As Intel’s first Hybrid CPU design however, there were some initial teething issues as managing threads between the different performance levels required adjustments to Windows’ scheduler. Microsoft already has experience with this when dealing with Windows on Snapdragon devices using the Arm architecture, however it was a first for x86 and the first implementations were reportedly quite rough.

In reality, because of the price of the device, it was compared to hardware that had only big cores. Even if it was compared to Atom based notebooks in the $400 range, because the processor was a low powered device, often lower than the Atom notebooks it was being compared to, it didn’t fall favorably in those benchmarks either. The goal of Lakefield for Intel wasn’t performance, but experience and form factor innovation, which benchmarks never indicate.

The note today from Intel indicates that Lakefield is now on the path to End of Life. This means the following milestones:

  • Start of Product Discontinuance: July 6th 2021
  • Last Corporate Assurance: October 8th 2021
  • Last Product Discontinuance Order: October 22nd 2021
  • Orders are Non-Cancellable from October 22nd 2021
  • Last Shipment Date: April 29th 2022

The start of the process means announcing that they will stop manufacturing processors (July 6th) and if a company wants to put in an order, they have until October 22nd. However that’s also the date where orders can’t be canceled or returned, and all orders will be shipped by April 29th. That means that products could still come out with Lakefield after April 29th, however the OEM partners will not have any means to secure additional stock.

Intel has set its sights on its future Hybrid CPU designs, with the upcoming Alder Lake platform set to launch end of this year in either desktops or notebooks. There is also talk that Windows 11 is better suited to deal with Intel’s hybrid designs from a scheduler perspective. Overall, to see its only public Hybrid CPU suddenly go on product discontinuance after only a year in the market isn’t a great commitment to the technology from OEM partners. Intel's own Product Change Notification states that 'market demand for the products listed has shifted to other Intel products'.

Related Reading


Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • mode_13h - Thursday, July 8, 2021 - link

    > thankfully most of the "security software" isn't compatible currently ;)

    LOL, yes. Hopefully, most of the malware also has yet to catch up!
  • Wereweeb - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    Yep, I'm glad I switched to Linux. And Steam's Proton is running more than enough games for me.

    The only big problem with Linux now is the lack of support for some key professional software.
  • flyingpants265 - Monday, July 12, 2021 - link

    Linux has a lot more problems than just that. If Linux were any good on desktop, people would be using it on desktop.

    They're missing what you mentioned, plus everything else.
  • BedfordTim - Wednesday, July 7, 2021 - link

    So really what you are saying is that your IT department are the problem not Windows. Even on the U series Windows should run without issues.
  • mode_13h - Thursday, July 8, 2021 - link

    > So really what you are saying is that your IT department are the problem not Windows.

    Wherever you point the finger of blame, it doesn't change the reality of the market to which that CPU was targeted.
  • TheinsanegamerN - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    I'd bet that if they loaded all that security software on chromeOS it would run like crap too.

    The issue here isnt windows.....
  • mode_13h - Friday, July 9, 2021 - link

    > if they loaded all that security software on chromeOS it would run like crap too.

    Chrome OS doesn't have the same reliance on native apps, and everything is more strictly sandboxed from the outset. The service architecture is also more locked down than Windows. So, it doesn't need the same level of bloatware to make it secure.
  • Tams80 - Saturday, July 10, 2021 - link

    Then your IT can sandbox apps on Windows and lock everything else down.
  • Tams80 - Saturday, July 10, 2021 - link

    That's not Microsoft's fault; that's your employer's fault for loading a load of crap onto it.

    Perhaps they would be better off using MacOS due to its increased security through obscurity.
  • mode_13h - Saturday, July 10, 2021 - link

    Apple isn't using this CPU, which limits it to mostly Windows machines.

    As for my situation, my employer is a Windows shop. I have no influence over that. They control which hardware we're allowed to buy, and they manage all the software installed on it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now