Acer Chromebook 13: 1080p with Tegra K1by Jarred Walton on January 23, 2015 10:00 AM EST
Acer Chromebook 13 Performance
I commented on the previous page that performance can at times feel lacking with the Chromebook 13. I think a large part of that comes from the NVIDIA Tegra K1 SoC, unfortunately. I’ve used an NVIDIA SHIELD, and going from an 8-inch tablet to a 13.3-inch laptop you’d think maybe they could push performance a bit more, but in most cases it’s a wash. Being a Chromebook (laptop), however, most sites will default to a heavier non-mobile view that can take a bit longer to fully process and display, and interactions with the laptop during this time can be very sluggish.
Benchmarks alone don’t necessarily convey the complete performance experience, so let me preface this section by saying that the older C720 was clearly more responsive in certain workloads. If you’ve never used the C720 then the Chromebook 13 won’t necessarily feel too slow, but switching between the two – or running tests simultaneously on both laptops – shows that while TK1 is more power friendly, the Haswell Celeron ends up being faster in nearly every computational workload. Even graphics doesn’t generally favor TK1, though the difference in screen resolution certainly plays a role as the C720 was only available with a 1366x768 panel.
For our performance testing of Chromebooks, we end up using a lot of tests that we run on tablets as there aren’t many Chromebook benchmarks. Also keep in mind that some of our Chromebook results are quite old (relatively speaking), so while we are running the latest build of Chrome OS on the C720 and CB13, the other Chromebooks were tested more than a year ago. We also aren’t able to test the older models on newer benchmarks, so some of our charts only have a few results. With that out of the way, here’s a quick look at performance.
|Additional Performance Results|
|Acer C720||Acer CB13|
|CrXPRT Battery (Hours)||8.52||9.9|
|OORT Online (WebGL)||3270||4010|
|Spacerocks (WebGL - FPS)||18||30|
|WiFi FTP Download (Mbps)||100||115|
And there’s the rub: no matter how much NVIDIA might like to say otherwise, when it comes to competing with Intel’s Core architecture there’s still a huge performance gap on the CPU side of the fence. If we were talking about a 10-20% difference, you could say I’m splitting hairs, but the C720 is well over 50% faster in all the non-graphics workloads, and in a few cases it’s close to twice as fast. Given we’re not even talking about particularly speedy processors to begin with – the Celeron 2955U is literally Intel’s “slowest” Haswell processor – a 50-100% improvement in performance is something you will notice.
Just typing in Google Docs – or heaven forbid, Microsoft’s Office 365 Word online, which can feel a bit like a pig even on a fast desktop PC – the experience can be anywhere from a bit laggy on the Chromebook 13 to downright slow. Open up a long Reddit page or other complex website and again performance starts to matter. I’m enough of a power user to appreciate added performance, even on a budget Chromebook, and the upcoming Chromebook 15 will certainly be interesting to look at.
Also of interest is the WiFi performance testing. Using my 3x3 802.11ac router and a 5GHz connection for both Chromebooks (though the C720 is only 802.11n), the two Chromebooks end up delivering pretty similar WiFi results. The Chromebook 13 is technically faster with its 1x1 802.11ac adapter, but while that should in theory allow well over 200Mbps of real-world throughput, in testing it topped out at 115Mbps. The C720 on the other hand manages 100Mbps; I'm not sure if it has a 2x2 or 1x1 802.11n adapter, but the net result is a relatively small difference in throughput.
With all this talk of performance, it’s important to take a step back again and ask the question: what are you going to do on your Chromebook? For every task that I might run that can push the performance limitations a bit, there are plenty of options where a Chromebook works fine. Both the C720 and the CB13 handled 1080p YouTube videos without a problem, and if you want to store an MP4 video locally they also handle that fine. For everyday Gmail (or other web mail) and Internet surfing, the Chromebook 13 is definitely good enough. And again, the keyboard just has a good feel to it, so as I write this review I may at times want to switch to my desktop, but that’s only because I prefer the desktop version of Word to Google Docs, not because of the typing experience.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
JarredWalton - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkNo, as it's not supported on Chrome OS. I'd really like to add some better graphics/gaming benchmarks if possible, but I just don't know of any. If you have recommendations, let me know!
twotwotwo - Sunday, January 25, 2015 - linkI have one. (On it now.) The big thing I'd mention that's not here is there are glitches--session crashes if I use an external monitor for a long time, occasional reboots (maybe triggered by very low battery), and an ignorable but really odd glitch where garbage flickers up on part of the built-in LCD for one frame. GMail loads awful slowly, and Google Play Music stutters (meaning software isn't all there yet--music is smooth on my much-lower-powered phone!).
Despite all that I like it; I'm using the 4GB RAM model and running Ubuntu alongside Chrome OS via crouton just to have a local Unix shell. It's a nice cheap portable terminal first and just happens to sort of serve as a standalone computer too. Those issues make it hard for me to recommend it to most other folks, though.
sonicmerlin - Sunday, January 25, 2015 - linkWhy didn't they use a Denver CPU?
JarredWalton - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkProbably wasn't ready in time, plus I'm not sure Denver is really all that great in the first iteration. If Denver is so awesome... why isn't it in Tegra X1? Ha.
darkich - Monday, January 26, 2015 - linkI know how ironic this will sound, but Google is horribly short sighted.
Optimized and polished Andromium-like Android (google it for more info) just kills Chrome in every single respect.
And Google just seems to fail realizing that for some reason
AceMcLoud - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - linkJust get a MacBook Air ...
JarredWalton - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - linkFor only five times the cost?
speculatrix - Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - linkDear Anandtech,
Please start all laptop reviews with a brief summary of the quality of the display options.
If the displays aren't reasonable quality I can quickly ignore the rest of the review.
I skimmed the first part of this review until I got to where it said the display was a poor TN, and read no further.
Hopefully others will find the review useful.
sunsetwatch - Wednesday, January 28, 2015 - linkAcer Chromebook is one of the best laptops ever released on the market. They have the most excellent specs and functions that could be of great for both business and entertainment.
zephonic - Sunday, February 8, 2015 - linkRe: the Chrome OS vs. Windows debate:
I much prefer Chromebooks over cheap Windows laptops. Less of a headache/irritant all around. I'm a Mac user, but I think Chromebooks are a better alternative to my iPad than a $500 Windows laptop. I still use my old Asus laptop for an occasional bout of C&C, but that's all.